A case study in how a protected tree turned into an $11k savings on a residential ADU
Take an ADU project that started with a hand drawing of a cottage over a detached garage, brought to the planning counter in 2022. A quick review there found the garage sitting two feet inside the rear setback, tolerated on the existing structure since 1948 but not tolerated for a new second story. That ends the first meeting. The project sits for a year while the city rewrites its ADU chapter, after which detached units become allowed on basically every lot in that zone, opening the door to a real set of drawings. Then a neighbor files a letter, not about the unit itself but about shade falling on her vegetable beds. Planning does not weigh in on the beds, but the letter happens to mention an oak tree on the property line, which triggers an arborist review nobody had flagged. The tree turns out to be protected, with a critical root zone that no footings can sit inside. Moving the footprint four feet toward the house, losing a closet and a window seat in the process, clears the review in six weeks. Total cost of the delay: two full years and roughly 9k in redrawn plans. The part worth remembering is that the tree ends up saving money. Sliding the footprint toward the house shortens the sewer run by 30 feet and allows tying into the existing electrical panel instead of installing a new service, a change that an electrician priced the alternative at around 11k on its own. A case like this is a reminder that a constraint that looks purely like a cost can sometimes cut cost somewhere else in the same plan.