Rena
  1. Forum
  2. Stories
Story

A servicer letter about insurance gave me four days to figure out my answer

Rural county, house I picked up subject-to eighteen months ago. Purchase was 71k, seller's balance was 58k at 3.5, I paid her 13k for equity in two pieces, half at closing and half six months later. Tiny deal by the standards of this room, normal for where I buy.

In month sixteen the policy renewed and the agent, doing his job, updated the named insured to reflect the trust the deed sits in. New declarations page went to the lender automatically the way they always do. Ten days later the servicer sent a letter to the borrower of record, the seller, asking her to confirm the ownership status of the property.

She called me before she called them, which is the only reason this story has an ending I like. I'd told her at the kitchen table before signing that this exact letter could arrive someday and that if it did, she should call me first and I'd get her the answer and pay for a lawyer to look at it if she wanted one. She remembered. Eighteen months later, she remembered.

So I had four days before the response window they printed on the letter. My options were to answer plainly, to say nothing, or to start moving toward the exit. I had a Plan B already, which was a small local bank that had told me they'd look at a refi on this thing at a rate about three points worse, and cash to cover the payoff gap if I had to sell instead.

We answered it. I paid a real estate attorney in that state for two hours to write four sentences and she sent them. Nothing happened. Payment posted on the first, the way it has every month since. But for four days I priced out selling a house I like, and I learned my contingency plan was more theory than I'd thought.

9 replies

The insurance renewal is the trigger I see most often and almost nobody plans for it. Every year the policy regenerates and every year a document with somebody's name on it goes to a lender's mail intake. You get one chance a year to be surprised.

Three points worse on 58k of principal is real money but it isn't ruinous, which is probably the reason you could think straight for four days. Same letter on a 400k balance and I don't know that I'm calm.

What I want to know is what the four sentences said. Not for the wording, for the posture. There's a version that's cooperative and factual and a version that volunteers structure nobody asked about, and the difference between those is the whole exercise. The lawyer earned her fee if she knew which question was actually being asked.

@warrant that's the right question. The letters I've read usually ask something narrow, has the property been sold, transferred, or is it still occupied by the borrower, and the trap is answering a broader question than the one on the page.

Hollow, the part I'd hold onto is that she called you first. That wasn't luck. You put the sentence in her head at closing and it survived sixteen months of nothing happening. Most people who do these deals say the transparency thing and then never test whether it stuck.

Your Plan B was a phone conversation with a bank and a rough idea of cash. Mine would have been the same and I'd have called it a plan. Did the four days change what you actually keep on file now, or just how you feel about it?

The detail I can't stop thinking about is that the insurance agent did nothing wrong. He updated a record accurately and that's what set the whole thing off.

Run the arithmetic on the downside and it's less scary than it feels in the moment, which is the useful part. 58k at 3.5 versus 58k at 6.5 is roughly 100 a month on a thirty year, call it a bit more. On a 71k rural house that might eat a third of your cash flow and it does not kill you.

The deals where the due-on-sale letter is genuinely fatal are the ones where the spread between the assumed rate and today's rate is the only reason the deal clears. If your deal still works at market rate, the clause is an expense. If it doesn't, the clause is the deal.

@ledger that's how I'd underwrite it too, and I'd add the second scenario, which is that they want the balance in full rather than a rate change. Refinancing is your out only if someone will lend on it at that moment, and a small rural property with a short ownership history and a title that moved through a trust is exactly the file a bank finds reasons to slow down on.

Hollow, the useful thing you got out of those four days is knowing your exit was a conversation and not a commitment. I'd want a written term sheet from that local bank, dated, refreshed once a year, even if I never use it.