Rena
  1. Forum
  2. Stories
Story

Somebody drew preferred equity as a set of stairs on a placemat for me

I'm land and long holds and I don't do any of this, but I ended up at a small dinner where two people spent forty minutes arguing about pref equity and I finally admitted I didn't know what they were talking about.

One of them turned over the paper placemat and drew stairs. Bottom step, the bank with the mortgage, gets paid first, has a lien on the building. Top step, the sponsor, the person doing the work, gets paid last and gets the upside. Middle step, preferred equity, gets paid after the bank and before the sponsor.

Then she said the part that made it click. The middle step doesn't own a claim on the building. It owns a piece of the company that owns the building, with a written agreement that says it gets paid before the sponsor does. So it looks like a loan from the sponsor's side and it is technically equity.

I asked why anyone would do it instead of just a bigger mortgage and the other guy at the table said because the bank won't lend that much anymore. Loans coming due were written when rates were lower, the new loan is smaller, and someone has to fill the difference.

I still don't fully see how you get paid if it goes badly, since you don't have the lien. But the stairs helped.

10 replies

The stairs drawing is the best version of this I've heard. I manage properties where there's pref in the stack and honestly from my chair nothing changes except who I copy on the monthly report.

@plumb that's how I understood it, yes. Priority on the money, ownership in form. The person drawing said it's a hybrid and to stop trying to make it be one or the other.

If it pays 10 to 15 percent and gets paid before the sponsor, why isn't everybody doing that instead of buying rentals? I assume there's a catch I'm not seeing.

@marlow the catch is the bank is still below you. If the property sells for less than the mortgage, you're gone before the bank loses a dollar. So you're taking real loss risk for that return.

@anchor two to four years is the shape I see most, because it's being used to bridge a refinancing rather than hold through a whole cycle. Documents usually have an outside date with consequences attached. @marlow to add to what @verity said, these are private placements and most of them have investor qualification requirements, so it isn't a menu you can just order from.

@orchard the going-badly question is the real one. Answer as I understand it is you take control of the company, which means you now own a problem property with a mortgage on it that you still have to pay.