$70 a visit for property data collection. Does that lead anywhere?
Someone reached out about doing property data collection for hybrid reports. I go out, measure, photograph to a standard, upload it, and a licensed appraiser I never meet writes the value opinion from my file plus the data. Pay quoted was $70 a visit, more if it's over 30 miles out.
What I can't tell is whether this is a first rung or a treadmill. Arguments I've been given for taking it: I learn to sketch and measure properly, I see a hundred interiors in a year, and I find out whether I actually like the work before spending thousands on qualifying education. Whoever signs the report carries the liability, not me.
Arguments against: none of those visits count as the supervised experience hours a license needs, at least not in the states I've read about, and that varies by state so I'd have to confirm with the board where I live. Two hours door to door with drive time and upload puts the effective rate somewhere under what a decent trade job pays, and the whole product exists because the lender wanted something cheaper than a full appraisal. Building a career on top of the cheap version seems backwards.
Which argument is actually stronger?
Is hybrid property data collection at $70 a visit a reasonable on-ramp?
17 votes