The fire marshal decides between six beds and ten either way
Two houses under contract review, one of them has to go.
House A: 3,200 sq ft, 4 bed 3 bath, single story, 0.4 acre. Asking 465k. Layout gets me 6 residents in 5 rooms if I convert the den. Existing 3/4 inch water service.
House B: 4,900 sq ft, 6 bed 4 bath, split level with three steps between wings. Asking 610k. Gets me 10 residents comfortably if I ramp a wing.
The part I can't get a straight answer on is where the licensing and building code lines actually fall. In my state the residential care license tier changes above a certain resident count, and above that count the local building department has been treating the house as a different occupancy group, which pulls in sprinklers, a second means of egress from the sleeping wing, and an accessible route between levels. Every state draws these lines differently and mine has a draft rule change pending, so I'm working off two phone calls and a PDF from 2019.
Rough numbers I have so far. Sprinkler retrofit quoted 34k to 46k depending on whether the 3/4 inch service has to be upsized. Split level accessibility, either a platform lift at around 22k installed or regrading the whole wing, which the GC would not price over the phone.
House A pencils at 6 beds with maybe 62k of conversion work. House B is 10 beds and somewhere north of 180k before furniture.
Revenue per bed in this submarket is running 4,400 to 5,200 private pay. 10 beds obviously carries a manager better than 6 does. I'm not sure 10 beds carries the extra 145k of code work plus a year of extra permitting.
What I actually have to decide by Friday is which one I release. What would make you take the bigger house anyway?