When an investor asks a scout to pre-qualify the seller before he'll pay more, that's not scouting anymore
Take a lead finder who works a residential trade and is on those streets five days a week, seeing vacant houses before the mail carrier does. Say he's been passing addresses to three local investors, with eleven leads submitted, two closed, and a flat fee of $1,500 each. Fine as far as it goes. Now one investor wants to change the deal: pay 2 percent of purchase price instead of the flat fee, which on typical $170k to $210k buys works out to $3,400 to $4,200, roughly double the flat rate. In exchange he wants the scout to knock, get the owner's asking number, learn their timeline, and soften them up before he calls, on the theory that it saves him two weeks. A scout in that position typically has a one page lead form (address, parcel number, exterior condition notes, occupancy signs, photos), a written fee agreement with payment on closing and no exclusivity, and a log of every address sent and when. The unresolved question is where lead finding ends and something requiring a license begins. The moment a scout is asking a homeowner what they'd take for the house and reporting it back for a cut of the price, that line gets close, and "everybody does it" is not an answer to where the line sits in a given state. The decision that scenario forces: take the 2 percent, hold at $1,500 and keep to public-facing information only, or counter with something in between.