Same Memphis house, BRRRR or straight buy and hold, and the spread is tighter than I expected
I ran this one twice because I kept thinking I was making an error. A three-bedroom in Whitehaven, asking $89,000, needs about $28,000 to get rent-ready, ARV I am comfortable with is $140,000. Rent in that pocket is $1,100 to $1,150, I used $1,100 to be conservative. Cash-out refi at 75% of $140,000 gives me $105,000. Total in is $89,000 plus $28,000 plus maybe $6,000 in holding and closing costs, so call it $123,000. I get $105,000 back, leaving $18,000 in the deal. Monthly on the refi at 7.5% over 30 years on $105,000 is about $735. Taxes and insurance in that zip I am budgeting $250 combined. So roughly $115 a month net before maintenance, vacancy, and management, and that number is thin enough that I do not sleep well on it. DSCR on the refi comes out around 1.14, which my lender says they will do but I have also read enough threads to know 1.14 is the version of this that works until it does not.
The straight buy and hold version is: I find something already stabilized around $105,000 to $110,000, put 25% down, so $26,000 to $27,500, same rent range, and I get roughly the same monthly number but I have kept $95,000 liquid. The problem is I do not find stabilized product in Memphis at that price that I actually trust. Everything I have looked at in that range has deferred maintenance that is just a slower version of the $28,000 rehab anyway, except I am paying closer to retail and I do not control what I am inheriting.
So the BRRRR leaves $18,000 in and the straight buy leaves $26,000 in and a chunk of optionality, but the stabilized buy gets me into the deal faster and with less execution risk. The $8,000 difference does not justify the rehab overhead to me at this scale, which is what I kept getting wrong when I assumed BRRRR always wins on recycled capital. It does, but not by as much as the method's reputation suggests when the ARV is only $140,000 and you are paying close to market on the acquisition.