A buried right of first refusal can eat a wholesale assignment fee entirely
Consider a 31,000 square foot multi tenant industrial flex property, four tenants, in a small southeast logistics market. Estate sale, listed for seven months with a residential brokerage, expired. In place NOI 196k. Contracted at $2.05M, a 9.56 cap, with a 45 day inspection and 25k earnest going hard at day 30. Assigned at $2.11M for a 60k fee, paid by wire out of escrow at closing. The part that can nearly kill a deal like this: a request for every lease plus every amendment turns up four leases and two amendments on the first pass. A second and third ask surfaces three more amendments, one of which, signed years earlier for a 9,000 square foot tenant, grants that tenant a right of first refusal on any sale of the building with 15 days to match. Nobody on the seller side remembered it existed, and the buyer's counsel won't close without a written waiver. Sending that notice early in the inspection period and then waiting is uncomfortable, especially if the tenant's owner is unreachable. If a ROFR holder exercises, the buyer at that price gets the building and the wholesaler's fee disappears entirely, since a matched ROFR doesn't owe an assignment fee. Worth building into every commercial assignment after an experience like this: seller consent to assignment negotiated into the PSA at signature, with the wholesaler staying liable on the contract; amendments requested as a separate line item from leases, since people hear leases and send leases; and estoppels ordered in week one rather than week five. How an assignment fee is disclosed on the settlement statement varies by state, so a local commercial closing attorney is worth the fee every time.