Six months with paid extensions or twelve months with minimum interest, same 65k bridge piece
An operator I've done business with before wants 65k behind a 480k senior on a 7 unit. Three units are offline, plan is to finish them, season the rents about four months, and refinance around month eight at a 1.25 DSCR. Rate to me is 12% interest only, 2 points, either way. The term structure is what I can't settle, and the two versions behave very differently when the plan slips.
Six months with two 60 day extensions at a point each. I get a scheduled decision point twice, priced. If lease up stalls I either get paid to wait or I push for a sale while there's still value. The problem is that a maturity I have no intention of enforcing is a bluff, and if I do enforce it I'm a junior lienholder trying to force an outcome with 480k of senior debt sitting in front of me and a standstill period I'd have to check in the loan documents.
Twelve months flat with a six month minimum interest. 3,900 of interest is locked regardless, so an early payoff at month eight doesn't cost me yield. No extension negotiation, no theater. What I give up is any scheduled moment to look at the file, and if the senior also matures at twelve months we arrive at the wall holding hands.
Whether a minimum interest provision does what the note says it does depends on state law and the drafting, so that's a question for a lawyer in the state where the property sits before I rely on it.
Third option people keep raising with me is to set my maturity inside the senior's, say 60 days short, so I'm the one with a reason to be at the table first. I can see how that helps and also how it just makes me the first person to have a problem.
Which term structure would you write on a small subordinate bridge piece?
20 votes