Learning subordinate risk from behind the senior lender or from being the senior lender first
For anyone allocating capital to private lending for the first time, there are two common paths into it, and they teach different things. Option one is small gap pieces behind other people's hard money loans. Yields quoted for this kind of piece are often in the low to mid teens plus a point or two, the pieces are small enough that a total loss is survivable, and the position forces real fluency in intercreditor language, payoff order and exits, because the money's safety depends on all three. The drawback is learning subordinate risk with no baseline for what a normal loan looks like when it performs without incident. Option two is a year in first position on smaller, plainer loans at lower yield. This shows the whole file, gives control of the payoff, and teaches how borrowers behave when a rehab runs long, before moving into gap pieces already knowing what a senior lender does when things slip, which is exactly what a junior position sits behind. A third path some suggest, putting money in a bridge fund and reading the reports, has real appeal for time-constrained investors but teaches comparatively little about the underlying risk. Starting in first position on plain, well-documented loans is generally the sturdier education, since the person who has stood as senior lender understands, viscerally, what a subordinate position is actually exposed to.
First year of private lending with a set amount of capital, where do you start?
11 votes