Self-service your notes or pay a licensed servicer from loan one
I have been calling servicers for a few weeks trying to understand what the service layer around private lending actually is, since that side of the business is where I keep landing. What I found is a real split among the lenders I talked to and no consensus at all.
The self-service case: on one or two loans, a servicer costs a setup fee plus something like $35 a month, and several told me they want a minimum number of loans before they will onboard you at all. Meanwhile the work is a payment coming in by ACH, a spreadsheet, a 1098 at year end if your loan requires one, and a phone call when someone is late. Lenders doing this told me they know their borrowers, they want the direct relationship, and a third party in the middle slows down every conversation about an extension or a modification.
The servicer case: borrower funds never touch your account, payoff demands and per diems are issued by someone who does it fifty times a week, the payment history is a document a court will look at rather than your own spreadsheet, and if you ever want to sell the note the file is already clean. The bigger point people raised is licensing. Whether collecting payments on a loan you made yourself makes you a servicer or a debt collector depends on your state and on whether the loan is consumer purpose, and a few lenders told me their attorney's answer to that question is the only reason they outsourced. Anyone relying on that needs their own attorney in their own state, since the trigger differs by state.
Where I keep getting stuck is the middle. If you self-service loan one and loan two and then a borrower goes quiet, you are learning default servicing on the file where it costs the most.
If you're making private loans with your own money, who services them?
10 votes