From the desk:Large Multifamily (Institutional)

$118k a door on a 1985 value-add, or $198k on a 2023 lease-up. Wrong axis?

Two things on my list this week and they're the same equity check.

Deal A. 176 units, 1985 vintage, garden style, in an inner-ring suburb of a midwest metro. $118k a door. Rents about $310 under the renovated comps in a two mile ring. Sponsor plan is $22k a unit inside plus roughly $1.8m of exterior and systems, which is roof, parking lot, two boilers and a full electrical panel replacement on eight buildings. Occupancy 91, delinquency 4 percent, so there's a resident quality story too. In-place cap 5.8, stabilized cap on cost 6.9.

Deal B. 288 units, delivered 2023, currently 74 percent leased with two months free on new leases. Merchant builder's construction loan is maturing. $198k a door, and the builder's all-in cost was about $254k. So I'm buying 22 percent under cost with zero renovation risk and a brand new asset. In-place cap on the current concession-burdened income is 4.1. Untrended stabilized, meaning today's asking rents with the concessions gone and 93 percent occupancy, gets to 5.5.

Deal A has more spread and I know how to do that work. Deal B has no construction risk, no roof, no scope creep, and a basis that a replacement-cost buyer would look at in three years and consider cheap. What Deal B has instead is that I'm underwriting the concession burn-off, and every month it doesn't burn off is a month of negative leverage on a 4.1 in-place.

The thing I can't get past is that Deal A's $310 rent gap is measured against renovated comps in a submarket where a 2023 building down the road is giving away eight weeks. If the new stuff is discounting, my renovated 1985 unit competes with a new unit at close to the same effective rent, and my $310 gap is really $150.

I have to give an answer on A by Friday because there's another bidder. B has no deadline, which is itself information.

Answer

2omar_haddadActivePRO11

Wrong handle on that, it's @bramble's post, I'm replying.

The $22k a unit on a 1985 garden with eight panels being replaced is where I'd stop. Panel replacement means permit, means inspection, means the inspector looks at whatever else is in that wall, and on a 1985 building in a lot of jurisdictions that's aluminum branch wiring or a mixed panel that nobody documented. I've had a $9k electrical scope turn into $31k because the inspector wouldn't sign off without pigtailing every device in the building. That is scope creep with a permit number on it, so you can't defer it.

Also $22k interior on 1985 stock, tell me what's in it. If it's flooring, paint, counters, appliances and lighting, that's a $14k to $16k package in most midwest markets and the extra six is either cabinets or plumbing. If it's cabinets you're fine. If it's plumbing you're opening walls in a building with cast iron stacks and galvanized branch lines, and then you're not doing 176 units in eighteen months, you're doing 90 and asking the lender for an extension.

On your real question, your $310 gap and the eight weeks free are the same number viewed twice, and I think you already know that. What I'd do before Friday is pull the renovated comps' effective rents, not asking rents. Call four of them as a shopper. If the renovated 1985 comps are also giving concessions, the gap is $150 and Deal A's stabilized 6.9 is a 6.2, at which point B's clean 5.5 with no execution risk and a basis 22 percent under cost looks better than it did an hour ago. B having no deadline tells you the maturing construction loan hasn't gotten scary yet. It will.

$118k a door on a 1985 value-add, or $198k on a 2023 lease-up. Wrong axis?

1 reply