At what point does 10 to 15 percent stop paying you for the subordinate seat?
Mezz targets 10 to 15 percent. Common equity in the same deals is usually pitched at high teens and up. So you're giving up several hundred basis points of upside in exchange for sitting ahead of the equity, a contractual coupon, and a pledge you can foreclose on.
The trade looks obvious at the top of the range. A 15 percent mezz coupon on a stabilized asset with a conservative senior in front of it is a good place to sit. At 10 percent on a transitional deal where the senior is already at 65 percent of a value nobody has tested, I'm less sure. You're taking equity-shaped risk in the downside scenario, because if the property is worth less than the senior balance your pledge is worth nothing, and you're taking debt-shaped returns in the upside.
Where I keep landing is that the number matters less than the attachment point. But people I respect argue the opposite, that the coupon is the only thing you can actually contract for and everything else is a story about value.
So which one binds your decision. Do you have a coupon floor you won't go below regardless of the stack, or is it attachment and last dollar exposure that decides and the rate is whatever the market gives you?
What binds your mezz decision more?
24 votes