I keep going back and forth on Annaly at roughly 13.5% yield versus just sitting in a 6-month T-bill at 5.3
The T-bill math is simple. Park 80k, collect about 4,200 over six months, roll it, done. No book value risk, no dividend cut risk, no spread compression story to follow.
The Annaly side has been paying around 88 cents a quarter per share so at current prices that's roughly 10,800 a year on the same 80k. That difference is real money. But I watched NLY cut from 1.00 to 0.88 in about a year, and the share price dragged down with it, so the yield on cost math stopped working the way I originally drew it up.
What I keep getting stuck on is that the T-bill path just delays the decision. Six months from now I'm rolling again and the rate could be 4.5 or lower, and suddenly the mREIT spread looks completely different. With Annaly I'm locking into a position that has duration risk baked in whether I want it or not.
I have no mortgage exposure in anything I own right now. Everything is equity. So part of me thinks the paper exposure makes sense as a diversifier, but the other part says I'm about to trade price stability for an income stream I can't fully underwrite. I've read through their last two 10-Qs and the hedge portfolio is substantial but it doesn't make me confident, it just makes me aware of how many things have to go right at once.
Has anyone held both at the same time and treated them differently in the allocation, like kept the T-bills as the dry powder bucket and the mREIT as something else entirely?