Bidding on a single note with a blank allonge and a recorded chain that stops in 2014
Say a single note is carved out of a larger tape. UPB $92,400, last payment October 2022, arrears with fees around $26,000 on top, ask $38,000. A broker BPO shows $141,000 as is and $163,000 repaired on an exterior only inspection, with occupancy listed as believed occupied, which usually means nobody actually knocked. The file typically contains a copy of the note, a copy of the recorded 2007 mortgage, one allonge endorsed in blank from the originating lender, and a payment history that only starts in 2019. The recorded chain shows an assignment into a securitized trust in 2014 and then nothing after that. The current seller is often an LLC several names removed from that trust and unable to say where the intermediate assignments live. How a judicial state court treats a broken recorded chain is a local counsel question, not a forum question, which is exactly why buyers get stuck on it. A blank allonge paired with possession of the original note is the usual working answer under the UCC, but that only holds if possession and the collateral file can actually be confirmed, not assumed. The decision generally comes down to three bids: bid full price with a document delivery condition the seller will likely strike, bid meaningfully below ask and let the seller keep the paper, or pass. What is hardest to price going in is the number of legal hours it takes to chase corrective assignments from entities that may no longer exist. Anyone who has actually run that chase to completion has the only real data point on what it costs in time.