Is paying a wholesaler 12k worse than spending 12k to find your own deal?
Trying to work out where money goes on the acquisition side, and I don't think this has an obvious answer.
The case for paying the fee: you see the actual property, with actual numbers, before any money leaves. You can say no. 12k spent on marketing buys you a chance at a deal, and anchor's thread in this room is a fine example of 1,900 dollars buying nothing at all. Buying from wholesalers also costs you no time, and time has a price if you have a job.
The case for building your own: the 12k fee comes out of your margin on every deal forever, and by the time a wholesaler has it, the property has usually been shopped to a list of buyers, so you're competing again. Being the only buyer at the table is the whole reason to be off-market, and paying a fee puts you back at a table with other people. Your own sourcing is also an asset that keeps producing after the first deal, where a fee is gone the moment it's paid.
There's a middle position where you pay fees for your first deal or two to learn what a real deal looks like from the inside, then build your own machine with better instincts.
I haven't landed anywhere on this. I come from the capital side, so I tend to reach for the thing that has a price on it, which might just be my bias.
You have 12k and no deal yet. Where does it go?
18 votes