Naming the default in the first letter: invasive, or the only honest thing to send?
Standing rule in most of the training I've read is that you never reference how you found the owner and you never put their foreclosure in the first line. Lead with help, let them raise it. The reasoning makes sense to me. The person is embarrassed, they've had a bad month, and a stranger's letter that opens with the worst fact about their life reads like surveillance.
But I've now met two operators who mail the opposite and say their numbers are better. Their piece says something close to "I understand a foreclosure sale may be scheduled on your home. There are usually more options than people think, including selling with your equity intact. Here is what I can do and how fast." Their argument is that the generic "I buy houses, any condition" postcard is indistinguishable from the forty other postcards in that mailbox, and that a homeowner with eleven weeks left doesn't have time to figure out which stranger is talking about their actual problem. They say response rate drops and conversion per response goes way up, because everyone who calls already knows the subject.
The other side says the explicit letter gets you the angriest reactions, the complaints, and the reputation in a small county that you're the vulture who mails people at the courthouse.
Whatever you pick, several states regulate what a solicitation to an owner in default can say, including required disclosures, so this is a question to run past a lawyer in that state before the mail goes out.
I don't have volume yet to test it myself. Where do you land, and does your answer change between mail and a door knock?
First contact with an owner in default: how do you handle the filing itself?
15 votes