What if the gap closes from the private side instead?

Question

Everything I read frames the REIT-to-private valuation gap as a reason to deploy into listed. My underwriting keeps producing the other resolution.

Concretely: my private open-end fund queue is marked at appraisal cap rates that imply values roughly 15 to 20% above where the listed market is pricing the same asset types. The gap can close two ways. Listed rerates up, which is the thesis. Or appraisers keep grinding marks down over six to eight quarters and the gap closes with listed flat and private down.

In the second case a listed sleeve earns its dividend and not much else, and my private sleeve takes the pain. That is not an argument against listed, it just changes what the position is doing in the portfolio. It is a hedge on the private book rather than an alpha trade.

So the sizing question: if I hold $9m in private funds at appraisal marks and I add $3m of listed, am I diversifying or am I doubling down on the same rent rolls with a different lag? And if the answer is the latter, does the liquidity of the listed leg still earn its keep, given I cannot redeem the private leg on any timetable I control?

Interested in how people who run both sides actually weight this.

Rena Expert · Accepted Answer

Both resolutions have happened historically, and mixed ones are more common than either clean version. Listed real estate has repriced first in most cycles because it marks continuously, and private appraisals have then followed with a lag of roughly four to eight quarters. So the gap usually closes from both ends, with the split depending on where rates go.

On the diversification question, at the asset level you are right that you are buying similar cash flows. The listed leg is not a hedge against your private book in any tight sense. What differs is composition and control. Open-end core funds are heavy in traditional sectors, and the listed universe gives you access to property types the private funds barely hold, data centers and towers being the obvious ones, plus senior housing operating structures that private core vehicles usually take in small doses. If you tilt the listed sleeve toward what the private funds do not own, you get real diversification. If you buy a broad index, you mostly get your private book with daily pricing.

The liquidity earns its keep in a specific way. You can rebalance the listed leg against the private queue, so if listed sells off another 15% you can add without waiting on a redemption window, and if listed runs first you can trim to fund capital calls. That optionality has value even when the two legs correlate.

What could break this: a 25% listed sleeve that you can actually sell tends to become the source of every liquidity need, so you end up selling the recovering asset to fund the illiquid one. Decide in advance which sleeve funds calls, and put it in writing to yourself, because the decision is much harder in the moment. Also note that supply forecast to fall sharply in industrial and other key sectors helps both legs, so tightening supply does not distinguish them.

stephen_ok9 · Answer

I am stuck on the same thing at a smaller scale. The part I cannot get past is that in your second scenario the listed sleeve still pays you while it waits, and the private sleeve pays a distribution funded partly out of income that appraisers are about to revalue. Different quality of cash flow even if the underlying buildings are identical.

tashaford30 · Answer

So the tilt is the whole point. If I own a broad REIT index alongside a core fund I have essentially bought the same thing twice, once with a lag.

devon_pierce · Answer

@sextant one thing that would change my answer is how your open-end fund handles a queue. If redemptions are gated you have no ability to act on convergence at all on that side, so the listed sleeve is the only lever you have. I would size it larger for that reason, not smaller.

raj_mehta14 · Answer

Trying to follow this and mostly failing on one point. When appraisers grind marks down, does anything actually happen to my account, or is it just a lower number printed on a statement until I try to redeem?

jordan_ellis2 · Answer

@vellum the number drives the redemption price you get, so it is real once you want out. Also drives the fee base on a lot of vehicles.

@sextant the part I would push on is your 15 to 20%. Is that measured against listed implied cap rates before or after you capitalize corporate overhead? Fathom's thread has the gap shrinking by half on adjustment, and if yours does the same the whole sizing question gets less dramatic.

What if the gap closes from the private side instead?

6 replies