If a buyer carried on seller financing stops paying, which lever actually protects the seller?
For anyone building a list of small houses to rehab and expecting to carry paper on several of them, because plenty of likely buyers won't clear a bank right now, the useful question is where negotiating capital should go. The room tends to split. One camp argues the down payment is the answer. Twenty five percent down means the buyer has real money in it, and even in the bad outcome the seller recovers a property worth more than the balance. The paperwork only matters after things have already gone wrong. The other camp argues the down payment is a comfort blanket and the documents are the actual protection. The wrong security instrument for the state, a missing prepayment clause, no escrow for taxes and insurance, and a seller can watch the county sell the house out from under their lien while the buyer's 25% does nothing for them. A third position worth considering is that a short balloon beats both, since it forces a fresh look at the borrower within a couple of years rather than relying on either lever alone. Every version has a cost. Big down payments shrink the buyer pool, which was half the point of carrying. Tight documents cost attorney hours. Short balloons scare buyers who've already been turned down twice.
Carrying a note on a house you sold, which lever does the most to protect you?
11 votes