If a buyer I carry stops paying, which lever actually saves me?
I'm building a list of small houses to rehab and I expect at least a few of them to sell with me carrying the paper, because plenty of my likely buyers won't clear a bank right now. So I've been trying to figure out what I'd spend my negotiating capital on, and the room seems split.
One camp says the down payment is the answer. Twenty five percent down means the buyer has real money in it, and even in the bad outcome you're recovering a property worth more than the balance. The paperwork only matters after things have already gone wrong.
The other camp says the down payment is a comfort blanket and the documents are the actual protection. Wrong security instrument for your state, a missing prepayment clause, no escrow for taxes and insurance, and you can sit there watching the county sell the house out from under your lien while the buyer's 25% does nothing for you.
There's a third position I keep bumping into, which is that a short balloon beats both, because you're never more than a couple of years from a fresh look at the borrower.
Every version costs something. Big down payments shrink the buyer pool, which was half the point of carrying. Tight documents cost attorney hours. Short balloons scare buyers who've been turned down twice already.
Carrying a note on a house you sold, which lever does the most to protect you?
11 votes