Cash for the equity at closing, or pay the seller monthly?
I'm still in the reading stage on sub-to, and the piece I can't settle is how the seller's equity gets paid. Every example I've looked at splits into two shapes.
Shape one, you hand over the equity in cash at closing. Say the seller owes 210k on a 3.4% loan, house is worth 260k, and you write a check for something like 30k after negotiation. Clean break. Seller has money, you have the deed, nobody has to talk again except about the loan sitting in their name.
Shape two, you pay the equity on terms. Small amount down, then a note to the seller at a low rate, or a balloon in a few years. Almost no cash out of pocket, which is supposedly the whole appeal of this. But now the seller is your creditor and your loan is still in their name, so the relationship keeps going for years.
Case for cash: fewer moving parts, and the seller's exposure is at least reduced to one thing instead of two. Case for terms: you keep reserves, and reserves are what let you cover the payment if something breaks, or refinance if the lender ever calls the loan.
I genuinely don't know which one a careful beginner should be aiming for. Curious what people who have actually closed these prefer.
How should the seller's equity get paid on a sub-to deal?
24 votes