On a paper $4M raise, does the acquisition fee actually stay with the sponsor?
A useful exercise for anyone who has only read about promotes in the abstract is to build a paper deal and pay the sponsor in the spreadsheet. Here is one to work through. Take 60 units at a $6.5M purchase, a $4M equity raise covering down payment, capex, closing and reserves, and a $4.5M loan. Fee assumptions drawn from what commonly shows up in offerings: 2 percent acquisition fee ($130k at close), 1.5 percent asset management on invested equity ($60k a year), 1 percent disposition. An 8 percent pref, 70/30 split above that. Year one shows $190k of fee income and it looks great on the line. Then start listing what has to come out of it, and the $130k stops looking so comfortable. Costs of doing the raise itself, before anything else: a securities lawyer to draft the offering, an entity or two, third party reports in diligence, a market study, accounting and K-1 prep every year, and whatever the fund admin platform charges. Put placeholder numbers on those and the exercise gets honest fast. So the question worth putting to the room. Is the acquisition fee generally income to the sponsor, or is it mostly reimbursement that goes straight back out the door? And what is missing from that cost list entirely?