Wrap on a house I'm renovating: deed to me now, or does she keep title until payoff?
Seller owes 118,000 at 3.25 percent on a 1960s ranch that needs about 60,000 of work. She'll wrap at 6.5 percent on a 245,000 price with 25,000 down, 30-year amortization, balloon at seven years. Spread to her is real and she knows it.
Her attorney's first draft is a contract for deed. She keeps title, I take possession and pay, and I get the deed when the note is paid or refinanced. My attorney's draft is the other shape: she deeds the house to me at closing and I give her back a note secured by a recorded deed of trust that wraps her existing loan.
The case for me holding the deed. I'm pulling permits and doing structural work, and the city and my carrier both want to know who owns the building. My money goes into a house I have record title to, which means a lien search finds me and a judgment against her doesn't attach to what I've built. If she dies or gets sued mid-term, my position is on record.
The case for her holding title. Her remedy if I stop paying is faster and cheaper in some states under a contract for deed than a full foreclosure, and that speed is exactly what makes her willing to carry a note to a stranger on a house that's a construction site. She's also less exposed to a transfer showing up in her lender's system, since nothing gets deeded. Some states treat a long contract for deed like a mortgage anyway and make her foreclose regardless, and some require it recorded, so the advantage she thinks she's getting may not exist where the house is. That's a question for a lawyer licensed there.
I've argued myself both directions twice this week. Curious where the room lands and why.
On a wrap where the buyer is renovating, how should title be held during the note term?
29 votes