Investor offered me ride-alongs instead of a fee for my first few leads. Is that a deal or a discount?
Two weeks in and I've got a conversation going with a buyer who does maybe fifteen houses a year. He said something I can't work out. For my first three leads, no finder's fee, but I ride along on every walkthrough, I sit in on the seller calls, and he'll go through his numbers on any deal he buys, including the ones he passes on and why.
After three, we talk about a fee.
One way to read it: that's the apprenticeship, and it's worth more than $1,500. I don't know how to tell a good lead from a bad one yet, so my first three are probably close to worthless to him anyway and he's paying for them with time. Watching someone underwrite fifteen houses a year would take me a year to buy any other way.
The other way to read it: I do the work, he gets the leads, and "we'll talk about a fee" is a sentence with no obligation in it. If my third lead is the one that closes for a $20,000 spread, I get education. And there's a version where the ride-alongs happen twice and then he's busy.
I've read people here say never work free and I've read people say the first year is tuition. Both sound reasonable coming from people with more deals than me. So which side would you actually take if it were your first three?
First three leads: fee, or access?
29 votes