The ADU rent that qualified me was $350 above what it actually leased for
Closed in the fall on a one unit with a detached studio over the garage, $415k, 5 percent down, owner-occupied conventional. I qualified partly on projected rent from the studio, which is the mechanism everyone here has been talking about since Fannie's change. Anybody using it should get their own lender's version of the vacancy factor and the cap in writing, because mine applied a haircut I did not expect until underwriting.
The appraiser's rent schedule put the studio at $1,650. My lender took 75 percent of that, so roughly $1,237 counted toward qualifying income, and the cap on how much of my total qualifying income could come from that unit was not the binding constraint for me. My DTI came in at 47 percent with the studio income included. Approved, closed, fine.
The studio leased at $1,300 after seven weeks empty. That's a $350 gap on the appraiser's number and I'm not blaming the appraiser, the comps he used were two newer builds with in-unit laundry and mine has a kitchenette with a two burner cooktop. It also needed about $6,200 before it was rentable: a subpanel fix the inspector flagged, a real door lock, and the cooktop replaced. None of that was in my closing budget.
So year one: payment $3,100, average studio collection across twelve months about $980 after the vacancy, plus the $6,200. I ran through my reserves in month four and put the subpanel work on a card. The house is fine. My cushion is gone.
What I'd do differently. Get written rent quotes from two local property managers before the appraisal comes in, and underwrite off the lower one with a further haircut. Ask the lender for the vacancy factor and the qualifying cap in writing at pre-approval rather than at underwriting. And do not close at 47 percent DTI when the income at the top of that stack is a unit that has never had a tenant in it.