Pledge of the LLC instead of a lien on the building. Better or worse for the lender?
I've been reading a mezz loan package for practice, no money in it, and the collateral section stopped me. The senior lender has a mortgage on the property. The mezz lender has a pledge of the membership interests in the LLC that owns the property. So if the borrower stops paying, the mezz lender doesn't take the building. It takes the company that owns the building, and the building still has the first mortgage sitting on it.
The case that this is better for the mezz lender: taking over a pledged equity interest under UCC procedures is generally faster and cheaper than foreclosing a mortgage, and how much faster depends on the state, so anyone doing it for real needs local counsel on timing. You skip a lot of process and you end up owning the sponsor's seat instead of buying a building at auction.
The case that it's worse: you own an entity, which means you own everything that entity signed. The senior loan, the leases, the tax position, whatever the sponsor did before you showed up. And you have to keep the senior current from day one or you get wiped anyway.
So for the beginners in here, which framing is closer to right? I don't have a settled view and I want to hear from people who have actually stood in that seat.
For a mezz lender, is an equity pledge better or worse collateral than a direct lien on the property?
21 votes