Flat annual custodian fee or a percent of assets, when the first thing I fund is one 40k note
I'm setting up a self-directed IRA to move about 60k of old retirement money into real estate paper, and the two custodian fee models I've been quoted are shaped completely differently. One is a flat annual fee plus a per-transaction charge every time money moves. The other is a percentage of account value with unlimited transactions.
A self-directed IRA, for anyone as new to this as I am, is a retirement account at a custodian that will hold private assets like a loan or a syndication interest instead of only public funds. The custodian doesn't pick anything, it just holds title and processes what you direct.
The flat fee looks cheap on a small account and stays cheap as the account grows, so if this becomes 300k of notes in eight years I'd be paying the same as I do on 60k. But every payoff, every new loan funded, every wire is another line item, and if I end up doing a lot of small short loans those add up fast.
The percentage model punishes growth and rewards activity. I genuinely can't tell which one fits a small note book that turns over.
For a small self-directed IRA deploying into notes, which custodian fee model would you take?
29 votes