My sponsor's preferred equity got crammed by a senior mod he never told me about

Question

We were 14 months into a 36-month hold on a 220-unit garden complex outside Columbus. I was in at $1.8M on the pref tranche, 9% current pay, 1.2x minimum multiple, 24-month outside redemption date. Senior debt was a three-year bridge at $28.5M with a regional bank. Rates moved, the NOI came in soft, the sponsor went back to the lender to negotiate a modification, and that modification included a cash sweep provision that effectively starved the waterfall before my current pay ever got touched. I found out from the quarterly report, not from the sponsor. The operating agreement had a notice requirement for material changes to the senior loan. He filed it as an "administrative amendment." I have an attorney who disagrees with that characterization and we are still disagreeing about it eight months later. The thing I did not build in tightly enough was a definition of what triggers my notice rights. I wrote "material modification to the senior debt" and did not define material. That gap is now doing a lot of work for the other side. If you are sitting in a pref position on a value-add deal with bridge debt right now, go read your notice clause and ask yourself whether a rate extension, a cash sweep addition, or a covenant waiver would qualify under the language you actually signed, not the language you thought you signed.

aliyah_b · Answer

Same gap, different deal, $640K in at 8% current pay on a 180-unit in Dayton, 2021. My "material modification" language had no dollar threshold, no enumerated triggers, nothing. Sponsor added a springing cash trap at 1.15x DSCR and called it a technical clarification. Eighteen months of current pay just stopped.

marcus_odell · Answer

The "administrative amendment" framing is exactly the play because it sounds procedural and boring and most LPs never push back on it. Eight months of attorney fees later you know it is not boring.

One thing nobody upstream mentioned: even if you win on the notice argument, you may still be stuck because the lender's modification rights under the senior loan almost certainly did not require your consent at all. Your fight is with the sponsor for failing to tell you, not with the bank for doing it. Those are two different remedies with two different recovery timelines, and one of them probably ends in cash and one of them probably ends in a judgment you cannot collect.

The definition of material is the gap but so is what the remedy actually is when notice was owed and not given. I have seen operating agreements that require notice but say nothing about what happens if notice is breached, and that silence is almost as expensive as the missing definition.

My sponsor's preferred equity got crammed by a senior mod he never told me about

2 replies